| << Stats Home | Horses | Races | Winners | Starting Prices |
|
Trainers - General |
| Season | Total Sires | Sires with between 1 to 10 runners | Sires with between 11 to 20 Runners | Sires with more than 20 Runners |
| 2002 | 359 | 264 (74%) | 69 (19%) | 26 (7%) |
| 2003 | 342 | 251 (74%) | 49 (14%) | 42 (12%) |
| 2004 | 368 | 264 (72%) | 58 (16%) | 46 (12%) |
| 2005 | 329 | 233 (71%) | 52 (16%) | 44 (13%) |
| 2006 | 339 | 247 (73%) | 52 (15%) | 40 (12%) |
| 2007 | 356 | 271 (76%) | 39 (11%) | 46 (13%) |
| 2008 | 372 | 281 (76%) | 44 (12%) | 47 (12%) |
| 2009 | 339 | 246 (73%) | 40 (12%) | 53 (15%) |
| 2010 | 299 | 207 (69%) | 39 (13%) | 51 (17%) |
The full list of sires with number of runners is presented as a webpage for each season 2005 to 2010. The Sire Summary Index Page is linked from the main page for each season on the B2yoR site. The 2010 season is linked here when First Season Sire Iceman was top of the list with 61 individual runners followed by another First Season Sire in Iffraaj on 49 along with established sire Royal Applause.
In the three seasons 2002 to 2004 no sire had more than 45 individual runners while a total of seven were above that level in 2007. In 2008-10 the figures have been 6-4-5.
| Season | Total Sires with at least one win | Sires with 1 to 5 wins | Sires with 6 to 10 Wins | More than 10 Wins | More than 20 wins |
| 2002 | 201 | 146 (73%) | 31 (15%) | 24 (12%) | 1 |
| 2003 | 200 | 130 (65%) | 49 (24%) | 21 (11%) | 3 |
| 2004 | 208 | 138 (66%) | 50 (24%) | 20 (10%) | 3 |
| 2005 | 194 | 132 (68%) | 34 (18%) | 31 (16%) | 3 |
| 2006 | 189 | 129 (68%) | 35 (19%) | 21 (11%) | 4 |
| 2007 | 213 | 157 (74%) | 29 (14%) | 22 (10%) | 5 |
| 2008 | 211 | 149 (71%) | 36 (18%) | 26 (11%) | 6 |
| 2009 | 200 | 137 (69%) | 29 (14%) | 34 (17%) | 7 |
| 2010 | 180 | 109 (61%) | 39 (21%) | 32 (18%) | 2 |
The five with more than 20 wins in 2007 included three First Season Sires in Acclamation (top on 35 wins with 28 second best), Oasis Dream & Choisir along with Royal Applause (Acclamation's Sire) & Bertolini. In 2008 the six sires with 20+ wins included only Oasis Dream from the previous year. The other five were Captain Rio, Exceed And Excel*, Bahamian Bounty, Kyllachy & Kheleyf*. The asterisks indicate which of those were in their first season with runners.
In 2009 the seven
with more than 20 wins included Oasis Dream, Exceed And Excel & Bahamian
Bounty from the 2008 list along with established sire Invincible Spirit.
The other three were first season sires Avonbridge, Dubawi & Pastoral
Pursuits. In 2010 the two sires with more than 20 winners were Iffraaj*
and Invincible Spirit.
While following racing you will hear various biases expressed relating to the age of dams and their ability to produce competitive racehorses. These usually take the form of doubting the ability of first foals or the products of old dams being less competitive. The table below shows the wins-runs by different foal numbers relating to 2yo racing in the 2004-7 seasons.
It would be interesting to extend this
table to take account of class of runner by foal number. For example, although
older dams can produce competitive 2yos, are they at a lower level, on
average, than the product of younger dams?
|
|
|
||||||||
| Dam's Foal Number | Number of Runners | Number of Runs | Number of Wins | Wins to Run Percentage | Dam's Foal Number | Number of Runners | Number of Runs | Number of Wins | Wins to Run Percentage |
| 1st | 654 | 2,354 | 216 | 9.1% | 1st | 560 | 2,056 | 189 | 10.9% |
| 2nd | 453 | 1,671 | 180 | 10.8% | 2nd | 472 | 1,827 | 173 | 9.5% |
| 3rd | 393 | 1,433 | 154 | 10.7% | 3rd | 442 | 1,672 | 173 | 10.3% |
| 4th | 365 | 1,348 | 145 | 10.8% | 4th | 339 | 1,232 | 127 | 10.3% |
| 5th | 271 | 957 | 74 | 7.7% | 5th | 278 | 1,038 | 92 | 8.9% |
| 6th | 213 | 765 | 61 | 8.0% | 6th | 224 | 804 | 76 | 9.4% |
| 7th | 168 | 535 | 53 | 9.9% | 7th | 163 | 561 | 65 | 11.6% |
| 8th | 134 | 407 | 35 | 8.6% | 8th | 116 | 400 | 40 | 10.0% |
| 9th | 98 | 361 | 26 | 7.2% | 9th | 88 | 261 | 17 | 6.5% |
| 10th | 72 | 222 | 15 | 6.8% | 10th | 64 | 217 | 16 | 7.4% |
| 11th | 53 | 206 | 22 | 10.7% | 11th | 56 | 207 | 14 | 6.8% |
| 12th | 34 | 84 | 4 | 4.3% | 12th | 35 | 110 | 6 | 5.4% |
| 13th | 34 | 136 | 9 | 6.6% | 13th | 26 | 79 | 5 | 6.3% |
| 14th | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0% | 14th | 16 | 67 | 3 | 4.5% |
| 15th | 3 | 5 | 1 | 20% | 15th | 4 | 16 | 0 | 0% |
| 16th | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 16th | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0% |
|
|
|
||||||||
| Dam's Foal Number | Number of Runners | Number of Runs | Number of Wins | Wins to Run Percentage | Dam's Foal Number | Number of Runners | Number of Runs | Number of Wins | Wins to Run Percentage |
| 1st | 555 | 2,050 | 186 | 9.1% | 1st | 599 | 2,195 | 189 | 8.6% |
| 2nd | 428 | 1,556 | 169 | 10.9% | 2nd | 479 | 1,714 | 174 | 10.1% |
| 3rd | 372 | 1,433 | 154 | 10.7% | 3rd | 428 | 1,468 | 159 | 10.8% |
| 4th | 345 | 1,225 | 123 | 10.0% | 4th | 377 | 1,359 | 122 | 9.0% |
| 5th | 220 | 749 | 98 | 13.1% | 5th | 295 | 1,018 | 85 | 8.3% |
| 6th | 219 | 755 | 62 | 8.2% | 6th | 239 | 850 | 88 | 10.4% |
| 7th | 139 | 453 | 41 | 9.4% | 7th | 191 | 584 | 44 | 7.5% |
| 8th | 119 | 365 | 49 | 13.4% | 8th | 152 | 511 | 55 | 10.8% |
| 9th | 105 | 340 | 34 | 10.0% | 9th | 122 | 436 | 43 | 9.9% |
| 10th | 75 | 229 | 15 | 6.6% | 10th | 90 | 280 | 27 | 9.6% |
| 11th | 47 | 155 | 20 | 12.9% | 11th | 56 | 177 | 18 | 10.2% |
| 12th | 29 | 109 | 9 | 8.3% | 12th | 39 | 152 | 15 | 9.9% |
| 13th | 15 | 52 | 4 | 7.7% | 13th | 18 | 50 | 6 | 12.0% |
| 14th | 8 | 24 | 2 | 8.3% | 14th | 19 | 72 | 7 | 9.7% |
| 15th | 7 | 14 | 1 | 7.1% | 15th | 7 | 24 | 0 | 0% |
| 16th | 4 | 16 | 1 | 6.3% | 16th | 5 | 15 | 2 | 13.3% |
|
|
|
||||||||
| Dam's Foal Number | Number of Runners | Number of Runs | Number of Wins | Wins to Run Percentage | Dam's Foal Number | Number of Runners | Number of Runs | Number of Wins | Wins to Run Percentage |
| 1st | 595 | 2,145 | 218 | 9.8% | 1st | 580 | 2,267 | 218 | 9.6% |
| 2nd | 492 | 1,781 | 173 | 9.7% | 2nd | 477 | 1,816 | 190 | 10.5% |
| 3rd | 435 | 1,460 | 158 | 10.8% | 3rd | 405 | 1,444 | 169 | 11.7% |
| 4th | 352 | 1,186 | 118 | 9.9% | 4th | 337 | 1,203 | 135 | 11.2% |
| 5th | 287 | 978 | 99 | 10.1% | 5th | 279 | 946 | 99 | 10.5% |
| 6th | 246 | 836 | 79 | 9.4% | 6th | 257 | 924 | 108 | 11.7% |
| 7th | 185 | 595 | 59 | 9.9% | 7th | 176 | 643 | 49 | 7.6% |
| 8th | 131 | 493 | 45 | 9.1% | 8th | 136 | 482 | 57 | 11.8% |
| 9th | 123 | 406 | 35 | 8.6% | 9th | 92 | 314 | 24 | 7.6% |
| 10th | 82 | 273 | 36 | 13.2% | 10th | 76 | 254 | 16 | 6.3% |
| 11th | 49 | 175 | 15 | 8.6% | 11th | 54 | 143 | 10 | 7.0% |
| 12th | 35 | 111 | 6 | 5.4% | 12th | 24 | 70 | 4 | 5.7% |
| 13th | 23 | 73 | 6 | 8.2% | 13th | 19 | 66 | 4 | 6.1% |
| 14th | 9 | 23 | 2 | 8.7% | 14th | 5 | 12 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 15th | 6 | 19 | 1 | 5.3% | 15th | 3 | 12 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 16th | 2 | 7 | 1 | 14.3% | 16th | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0% |
|
|
|
||||||||
| Dam's Foal Number | Number of Runners | Number of Runs | Number of Wins | Wins to Run Percentage | Dam's Foal Number | Number of Runners | Number of Runs | Number of Wins | Wins to Run Percentage |
| 1st | 565 | 2,038 | 189 | 9.3% | 1st | - | % | ||
| 2nd | 456 | 1,685 | 202 | 12.0% | 2nd | - | % | ||
| 3rd | 388 | 1,425 | 152 | 10.7% | 3rd | - | % | ||
| 4th | 364 | 1,210 | 141 | 11.7% | 4th | - | % | ||
| 5th | 284 | 970 | 100 | 10.3% | 5th | - | % | ||
| 6th | 210 | 767 | 81 | 10.6% | 6th | - | % | ||
| 7th | 208 | 780 | 53 | 6.8% | 7th | - | % | ||
| 8th | 147 | 568 | 74 | 13.0% | 8th | - | % | ||
| 9th | 103 | 317 | 37 | 11.7% | 9th | - | % | ||
| 10th | 84 | 292 | 23 | 7.9% | 10th | - | % | ||
| 11th | 53 | 192 | 15 | 7.8% | 11th | - | % | ||
| 12th | 38 | 126 | 10 | 7.9% | 12th | - | % | ||
| 13th | 13 | 50 | 6 | 12.0% | 13th | - | % | ||
| 14th | 9 | 29 | 2 | 6.9% | 14th | - | % | ||
| 15th | 4 | 13 | 1 | 7.7% | 15th | - | % | ||
| 16th | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0% | 16th | - | % |
In 2010 there were 62 races in Class 1 which covers the Group and Listed level events. The following list breaks down the 62 by foal number:-